Globlisation And Nationalism - Comparative Analysis

As a matter of fact, it has been revealed that nationalism has had less importance and a great deal of difficulty for the survival of organisations because it has raised the state of trade war among nations. However, it has also been stated that nationalism also proves beneficial from globalisation and also becoming equally important (Ariely, 2019). Thus, to explore the relationship of nationalism and globalisation, to address their impact on each other, I have conducted research. This is based on how these concepts come in terms of interaction with each other, including the key aspects of their interaction. Conducting research on globalisation and nationalism, also essential to economically understand what the main benefits people can gain by these two concepts (Pieterse, 2019). Therefore, to define the concept of both wide topics with their role in operating the organisation at a global level, comparative research has been conducted. By investigating on relationship between resistance as well as confrontation, it has been evaluated that nationalism is expected to lose out or eventually leave the centre stage for other alternatives (supranational), which is required by globalisation (Witt, 2019). On the other hand, nationalism, along with the expectation to persist, also aids in increasing and intensifying opposition and response to the forces of globalisation (Ariely, 2019). So, for designing comparative research on these two concepts, I have chosen the two case studies of different nations. It includes the two biggest nations that are the UK and the US, where studying on impact of Brexit, political interventions on the operational performance of organisations have been evaluated (Chevalier and Buckles, 2019). While for the US, the interconnectedness of organisations has not threatened the sovereignty of this country has been explored. Therefore, it has been identified through studying both cases that globalisation has reshaped the growing international interconnectedness due to the tug of trade wars. Through the article of Rosenboim (2019), it has been evaluated that nationalism has helped existing organisations to reduce the negative impact of globalisation by abolishing national borders and undermining democracy (Globalism and Nationalism, 2019). For this purpose, restrictions on trade between national and international organisations have been implemented by the US president. In the context of the UK, through the article given by Ghemawat and Altman (2019), Brexit is one of the main examples of nationalism that has changed the political environment of this country completely. It has affected the organisational performance of companies in both negative and positive ways (The State of Globalisation in 2019, and What It Means for Strategists, 2019). So, in both cases, disputes between countries and their largest trade partners have been discussed, which has helped me to reveal the role of nationalism and globalisation in organisational performance (Doran, 2019). Along with this, the dependent variable in the cases of both countries is nationalism, which is independent from globalisation but affects the concept of each other in a wide manner. In the case of the first article, the major focus is given to understanding the benefits and limitations that companies in the UK are facing due to globalisation. An article based on the US has revealed how political interventions or nationalism have vastly reduced the threat of sovereignty (Pieterse, 2019). These two concepts show that although both articles are designed to study globalisation and are based on the concept of nationalism, but still structured in different way.

In this regard, after gathering the information under the literature review, I have made a critique of the research paper to distinguish what has been done and what the research gap is (Pieterse, 2019). Hereby, in the literature review, an argument is made on how globalisation has diminished the importance of nationalism, including the way political parties of countries have made efforts to reduce the same parameters (Doran, 2019). This was the most highlighted issue in the discussion part of the research, but a gap has arisen when no information about how the positive effects of both nationalism and globalisation can be made is not revealed. Support from academic writing services UK has been helpful in identifying such gaps and refining the analysis with a more balanced scholarly perspective.

Also Read:- Impact of Globalisation on the Economy

Comparative analysis has enabled me to make an appropriate analysis of two wide concepts of the real world - Globalisation and Nationalism. It has helped in answering all questions which are related to how and why a system has reacted to perturbations of different types (Chevalier and Buckles, 2019). This research paper has shown how perspectives of different researchers, as per their articles, can be used for comparative analysis, by summarising a sound proof for research design, demonstration of incompleteness, description of a working implementation, as well as presentation of experimental results. Thus, the main advantage of using comparative analysis in research is maintaining the strong emphasis on naturalism only by summarising the case studies of other researchers. However, internal validity, time consumption and less reliability are also considered as the weak points of this method (Pieterse, 2019). The comparative analysis includes mainly qualitative research that raises questions about the validity and reliability of results as well. Along with this, the description of explanatory variables is also high, where control of extraneous variables is mostly dependent on different stages of research. Descriptive research has also provided an in-depth view of a chosen topic that I want to study, where the level of detail that I have found is extremely valuable. It is particularly true of comparative analysis that all data is collected qualitatively, which helps in creating new research questions, and researchers can form hypotheses about cause including effect relationships (Witt, 2019). However, this method fails to describe the causes behind the relationship of variables and doesn't provide valid results either.  

It has been concluded from the entire description that the essay made on concepts of globalisation and nationalism has revealed various aspects. Using the comparative analysis has helped in making a proper argument about benefits and limitations as well as the relationship of both concepts on a nation. This method has helped in conducting an in-depth analysis of the chosen topic and making arguments on different researcher's points of view.
To get more details about do my assignment, ask our experts.

UPTO55%

Avail The Benefit Today!

To View this & another 50000+ free

Enter Email

Submit